To solve this puzzle you must wind the string around the grey pegs in such a way that removing any single peg will allow the string to fall. Imagine the start and finish nodes pulling on the ends of the string: the string must come free when any one peg is removed, but must not come free if no pegs are removed.
author: Diggory Blake
This puzzle is similar to stringy, but is a more complicated version. Now we must either grok the arXiv paper or use group theory.
To use group theory, consider the two-peg stringy problem, and label the left peg A and the right B. Now we can denote the top side of peg A A
and the bottom a
, and similarly for B. A
and a
are inverses. We then find a string such that removing all the a
s and A
s results in B
s and b
s which cancel, and the same for A, e.g. ABab
, not including the start and finish pegs.
To extend to multiple pegs, add further elements, C
and c
for a third peg. Now append a C
, and invert the preceding elements such that the removal of the C
causes the entire string to collapse, and finally terminate with a c
: ABabCBAbac
.
Repeating the procedure, we get the full solution for four pegs: ABabCBAbacDCABabcBAbad
.
All that remains is to actually construct the string interactively, like so:
You can choose any peg-label mapping (I used top-left for A, bottom-left for B, bottom-right for C, top-right for D). It may help to edit the javascript source code in addPeg
like so:
//addHoverEffect(e1, {"fill": "#888"}, {"fill": "#ff0"}) addHoverEffect(e1, {"fill": "#aaa"}, {"fill": "#ff0"})
so that you can keep track of which side of each peg is which, although it should be soluble without this.